than the opposite? Closet-case much?
Best Answer:
Viola Ted at 20 May,2013
It's kinda stupid to say either SEX is more visually appealing when so many individuals of both sexes are incredibly repulsive.
Other Answers:
- Actually I agree with Name Name.
- I could make a case for either.
Men's testicles just look ridiculous, just dangling out there like loose leftover skin.
But frankly I think men's chests typically look better. I'm sexually, but not aesthetically, attracted to breasts; they're just weird functionless lumps of fat hanging off the chest. - Only in two worlds - America and Gender studs. Oh and Americans in gender studs.
- No. I think they likely aren't entirely straight or are asexual and just notice women's pretty clothes or something.
We're talking about a woman here, so I'll just address it. - It's kinda stupid to say either SEX is more visually appealing when so many individuals of both sexes are incredibly repulsive.
- it could be...
As i said in my last answer....I find tigers beautiful but 100% don't want to have sex with a tiger lol!
in fact it will give me a good laugh if some girl here is trying to tell us that men are into animals and hitler - because all men watch discovery channel! :)
Back to the question: it is possible to find something aesthetically pleasant without any sexual attraction. don't you find sunsets beautiful? i am sure you don't want to "do" the sunset though...
and personally I think women are both more visually appealing and sexually more attractive to me. However my attraction to women is mostly due to their beautiful & sexy faces...their vaginas kinda look like something "alien" to me :P. - It makes sense to me.
Many people are able to appreciate the beauty of their own gender without it implying anything about their sexual orientation, and it shouldn't. Like someone else said, they find tigers beautiful, but they're not sexually attracted to them and I'm pretty sure it's similar for humans. Those people simply appreciate human beauty in their gender.
Men rarely comment on male beauty for fear of being considered as homosexual, which seems to be extremely common. I mean you're doing it now.
If people didn't feel the need to connect everything to sex, it would be nice. If a man calls a man attractive, he's gay. If a woman has a certain haircut, she's a lesbian. If a man likes to wear pink clothing, he must be gay. Wish people would stop. - I'm heterosexual, so I'm attracted to guy's, and don't feel the need to be in a relationship with girls. Anyways on average a woman's body looks better even if she's a little chunky. Plus there's so many things today like push up bras, girdles,corsets, booty pads, and etc to make a woman look better than she may actually look.
You'd be surprise at what people actually look like when they're not in tight clothes, and have everything being pushed up with thing's like yoga pants. Most people don't have the body to walk around nude. Just saying....
@MDM yeah a chunky women is more likely to get play compared to a chunky man. - are you trying to ask me a real question or give your opinion? im confused. Cause you asked a loaded question. Women shave and care more about their beauty. Straight girls sit on girls laps, kiss them, and they aren't even close to gay. its life move on
Liz i agree when a man is a little chunky nobody wants to see him. Some people think short stubby guys don't look good. no matter how much lift. Short girls get just as much love as tall models. With men you have to be a certain look.
Liz i agree more often than not you take somebody clothes off its not going to be a good thing - michael fassbender in 300?!
